Due to the nature and distribution of the nursing literature, it is especially important for the searcher to understand and respond to the focus of the researcher. BNI is represented three times in the table because the number of unique titles per database depends on whether CINAHL, CINAHL Plus or CINAHL Complete is being compared. Because of this major limitation, the question of which databases are necessary to retrieve all relevant references for a systematic review remains unanswered. On this page you will learn how to limit your results in CINAHL to: Video: CINAHL Quick Guide at Walden Library (YouTube), (2 min 24 sec) Recorded April 2020
J Clin Epidemiol. official website and that any information you provide is encrypted It therefore finds articles in which the topic of research is not mentioned in title, abstract, or thesaurus terms, but where the concepts are only discussed in the full text. PubMed CINAHL provided the majority of relevant articles for the second search, on computers and privacy, but inclusion of MEDLINE and EMBASE enhanced retrieval somewhat. Percentage of systematic reviews for which a certain database combination reached a certain recall. The researchers that requested the search received a deduplicated EndNote file from which they selected the references relevant for inclusion in their systematic review. Whether Embase and Web of Science can be replaced by Scopus remains uncertain. ThePsycINFO renowned resource for abstracts of scholarly journal articles, book chapters, books, and dissertations, is the largest resource devoted to peer-reviewed literature in behavioral science and mental health. 3 for the legend of the plots in Figs. For the search of nursing care literature on a medical condition, it . Within systematic reviews, when searching for relevant references, it is advisable to use multiple databases. For a search related to nursing, . Articles that are indexed with a set of identified thesaurus terms, but do not contain the current search terms in title or abstract, are screened to discover potential new terms. J Clin Epidemiol. 1990;23:58393. <>/XObject<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text/ImageB/ImageC/ImageI] >>/Annots[ 9 0 R 10 0 R] /MediaBox[ 0 0 612 792] /Contents 4 0 R/Group<>/Tabs/S/StructParents 0>>
Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab. Journal coverage, which spans from the 1800s to present, includes international material selected from around 2,400 periodicals in dozens of languages. FOIA The site is secure. Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page All authors have approved the final manuscript. Posted on 16 December 2021 - 7:39 pm by . Objective: To review the literature on the benefits and disadvantages of clinical and medical audit, and to assess the main facilitators and barriers to conducting the audit process. Can Fam Physician. On this page you will learn how to limit your results in CINAHL to: Database designers and developers, the data and database administrators and end-users must understand this functionality to take full advantage of it. Films Media Group serves the education community through its four brands: Films for the Humanities and Sciences, Cambridge Educational, Meridian Education, and Shopware. MEDLINE did find unique references that had not been found in Embase, although our searches in Embase included all MEDLINE records. Handwashing OR "Hand Washing" OR "Hand Rubs" OR "Hand Disinfection". Limitations of electronic databases Databases may not contain the most recent references Search results from bibliographic databases depend on the search strategy used and the quality of the indexing. Most of the selected UK nursing journals have earlier start and entry dates in CINAHL than BNI. ProQuest Nursing & Allied Health Source provides abstracting and indexing for more than 1,050 titles, with over 875 titles in full-text, plus more than 12,300 full text dissertations representing the most rigorous scholarship in nursing and related fields. Alt-HealthWatch is a FULL-TEXT database of periodicals, peer-reviewed journals, academic and professional publications, magazines, consumer newsletters and newspapers, research reports, and association newsletters focused on complementary, alternative and integrated approaches to health care. Careers. McGowan J, Sampson M. Systematic reviews need systematic searchers. . Disadvantages of Databases 1. The other study from the Journal of Advanced Nursing is indexed in MEDLINE and Embase but was only retrieved because of the addition of KeyWords Plus in Web of Science. In 72% of studied systematic reviews, the combination of Embase, MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Google Scholar retrieved all included references. andy gibb last interview. For all but one domain, the traditional combination of Embase, MEDLINE, and Cochrane CENTRAL did not retrieve enough included references. Bramer WM, Rethlefsen ML, Mast F, Kleijnen J. We see that reviewers rarely use Web of Science and especially Google Scholar in their searches, though they retrieve a great deal of unique references in our reviews. For reviews where RCTs are the desired study design, Cochrane CENTRAL may be similarly useful. Though we suspect that searchers who are not information specialists or librarians would have a higher possibility of less well-constructed searches and searches with lower recall, even highly trained searchers differ in their approaches to searching. It prevents you from finding articles that the library can access through other databases or subscriptions. Our study shows that, to reach maximum recall, searches in systematic reviews ought to include a combination of databases. In the other 48%, the recall by Scopus was suboptimal, in one occasion as low as 38%. 1 0 obj
Based on these calculations, we estimate that the probability that this random set of reviews retrieved more than 95% of all possible included references was 40%. For this study, we searched to achieve as high a recall as possible, though our search strategies, like any other search strategy, still missed some relevant references because relevant terms had not been used in the search. Using both Web of Science and Google Scholar in addition to MEDLINE and Embase increased the overall recall to 98.3%. Case studies may be prospective (in which criteria are established and cases fitting the criteria are included as they become available) or retrospective (in which criteria are established and cases are selected from historical records for inclusion in the study). In 23 reviews included in this research, Scopus was searched. mOkV1#8 (uTb Bramer WM, Giustini D, Kramer BM, Anderson PF. 2006 Jul;59(7):710-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.09.013. Once optimal recall is achieved, macros are used to translate the search syntaxes between databases, though manual adaptation of the thesaurus terms is still necessary. Almost all reviews (97%) reported a search in MEDLINE. Over a third of the reviews were therapeutic, while slightly under a quarter answered an etiological question. Res Synth Methods. Springer Nature. The higher recall from adding extra databases came at a cost in number needed to read (NNR). Our experience has shown us that it is also impacted by the ability of the searcher, the accuracy of indexing of the database, and the complexity of terminology in a particular field. Ahntastic Adventures in Silicon Valley CINAHL includes rigorous curation and indexing of open access (OA) journals, which has resulted in a growing collection of 1,096 active global OA journals. Although Embase covers MEDLINE, it apparently does not index every article from MEDLINE. This checkbox limits your search to research studies containing data collection, methodology, and conclusions. Other specialized databases, such as CINAHL or PsycINFO, add unique references to some reviews where the topic of the review is related to the focus of the database. Of course, the loss of a minor non-randomized included study that follows the systematic reviews conclusions would not be as problematic as losing a major included randomized controlled trial with contradictory results. J Kerman Univ Med Sci. Nursing & Allied Health SourceTM provides users with reliable healthcare information covering nursing, allied health, alternative and complementary medicine. This limiter box allows you to select specific article types. 0_!g3SR}W/galG/g)Wz37;467WfW_E\wf_Q"#H3)j\]'gr[ ~dFq @Xj7yfC
pOYAnaKruN" VI$wkD F\+ Fd7[)g `xBI@Oj If Erasmus MC authors had conducted more reviews that included only RCTs, Cochrane CENTRAL might have added more unique references. 'VI/:NAf] N1b
v4Fl8KTs cinQ Register a free Taylor & Francis Online account today to boost your research and gain these benefits: Comparison of CINAHL, EMBASE, and MEDLINE Databases for the Nurse Researcher, Assistant Librarian, Medical Center Library, University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL, 36688, Associate Director for Public Services, Scott Memorial Library, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, /doi/epdf/10.1300/J115V12N03_04?needAccess=true. For the search of nursing care literature on a medical condition, it was helpful to search both CINAHL and MEDLINE. Syst Rev 6, 245 (2017). For the individual databases and combinations that were used in those reviews, we multiplied the frequency of occurrence in that set of 200 with the probability that the database or combination would lead to an acceptable recall (which we defined at 95%) that we had measured in our own data. For each published systematic review, we extracted the references of the included studies. For 55 reviews, we determined the domain. scott burns lincoln ventures. Figure4 shows the distribution of this value for individual reviews. See Fig. The purpose of this research was to determine which of three databases, CINAHL, EMBASE or MEDLINE, should be accessed when researching nursing topics. Are included references being missed because the review authors failed to search a certain database? Privacy The information specialists of Erasmus MC developed an efficient method that helps them perform searches in many databases in a much shorter time than other methods. del rio rams . Where should the pharmacy researcher look first? What is lost when searching only one literature database for articles relevant to injury prevention and safety promotion? Systematic reviews of epidemiology in diabetes: finding the evidence. Using data sources beyond PubMed has a modest impact on the results of systematic reviews of therapeutic interventions. I;u?5Z=bL(lWh{d QrX". In both these reviews, the topic was highly related to the topic of the database. %PDF-1.5
Optimal database combinations for literature searches in systematic reviews: a prospective exploratory study, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-017-0644-y, http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/. Unauthorized use of these marks is strictly prohibited. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-017-0644-y, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-017-0644-y. Many of the articles reporting on previous research concluded that one database was able to retrieve most included references. Kr
Mo@h(fW"\x| Tu?g
n=~?@(wg This implies that 17% of the reviews in the PubMed sample would have achieved an acceptable recall of 95%. We assessed the frequency at which databases and combinations would achieve varying levels of recall (i.e., 95%). Lemeshow AR, Blum RE, Berlin JA, Stoto MA, Colditz GA. Searching one or two databases was insufficient for meta-analysis of observational studies. If the research question is more interdisciplinary, a broader science database such as Web of Science is likely to add value. Technical Problems Every computer system will have a breakdown. Other databases that we identified as essential for good recall were searched much less frequently; Embase was searched in 61% and Web of Science in 35%, and Google Scholar was only used in 10% of all reviews. That is with the generous assumption that the searches in those databases had been designed sensitively enough. Jz9+]J,y92Nt,t\9/FK:>
).{Qf3PSrPaU>`Pn8e==rIvyFAA-qYB6B
)lYUIJa)se2*O:+6XLe[S =d^J>]b=\qf'9E%L`DS_.A\yX Abbreviations: EM Embase, ML MEDLINE, WoS Web of Science, GS Google Scholar. See Fig. Fifty one of the 81 titles . To ensure adequate performance in searches (i.e., recall, precision, and number needed to read), we find that literature searches for a systematic review should, at minimum, be performed in the combination of the following four databases: Embase, MEDLINE (including Epub ahead of print), Web of Science Core Collection, and Google Scholar. using CINAHL alone. Beginning in May 2013, the number of records retrieved from each search for each database was recorded at the moment of searching. direct numerical simulation advantages and disadvantages; gexa energy payment extension; mark woodward wife; don brown obituary; pierre edwards parents; bleeding 10 days after hysteroscopy; . Many articles written on this topic have calculated overall recall of several reviews, instead of the effects on all individual reviews. PubMed Central When the number of references from other databases was low, we expected the total number of potential relevant references to be low. J Med Libr Assoc. For nine of these reviews, all the studies that had been included in the final synthesis were available in the CINAHL database, so it could have been possible to identify all the included studies using just this one database, while for an additional 21 reviews (49 %), 80 % or more of the included studies were available in CINAHL. HR;QBYVCU-7;-7O?zIo =IBK OH)k11H?3xQao7~Z| Ross-White A, Godfrey C. Is there an optimum number needed to retrieve to justify inclusion of a database in a systematic review search? Those databases that contributed the most unique included references were then considered candidate databases to determine the most optimal combination of databases in the further analyses. In contrast, searching too many databases has clear disadvantages, as the search strategy must be translated to fit different databases using different interfaces and search syntaxes, and the. Designed for an audience ranging from novice test consumers to experienced professionals, the MMY series contains information essential for a complete evaluation of test products within such diverse areas as psychology, education, business, and leadership. Disadvantages of using CINAHL There really aren't any, except that it's just a single database, and you might miss material that is available elsewhere. Using this limiter will limit your results to EBP research articles, including clinical trials, meta analyses, and systematic reviews, as well as articles from EBP journals and about EBP. For all individual databases or combinations of the four important databases from our research (MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Google Scholar), we multiplied the frequency of occurrence of that combination in the random set, with the probability we found in our research that this combination would lead to an acceptable recall of 95%. Sixteen percent of the included references (291 articles) were only found in a single database; Embase produced the most unique references (n=132). Wichor M. Bramer. Hartling L, Featherstone R, Nuspl M, Shave K, Dryden DM, Vandermeer B. These values were calculated both for all reviews combined and per individual review. Health Inf Libr J. Rethlefsen ML, Farrell AM, Osterhaus Trzasko LC, Brigham TJ. The collection contains thousands of proprietary, copyrighted images depicting normal anatomy, physiology, embryology, and histology, as well as the web's largest repository of reference illustrations depicting surgery, trauma, pathology, diseases and conditions. Searching only Embase produced an NNR of 57 on average, whereas, for the optimal combination of four databases, the NNR was 73. Furthermore, it is time-consuming for reviewers who have to screen more, and likely irrelevant, titles and abstracts. A comparative study of clinical end-user and librarian searches. McKibbon KA, Haynes RB, Dilks CJW, Ramsden MF, Ryan NC, Baker L, Flemming T, Fitzgerald D. How good are clinical MEDLINE searches? From the published journal article, we extracted the list of final included references. The recall of the database combinations was calculated over all included references retrieved by any database. HHS Vulnerability Disclosure, Help The third key database we identified in this research, Web of Science, is only mentioned as a citation index in the Cochrane Handbook, not as a bibliographic database. Scroll down the page below the search boxes to locate these filters or limiters. Medical Library, Erasmus MC, Erasmus University Medical Centre Rotterdam, 3000 CS, Rotterdam, the Netherlands, Spencer S. Eccles Health Sciences Library, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA, Kleijnen Systematic Reviews Ltd., York, UK, School for Public Health and Primary Care (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands, Department of Epidemiology, Erasmus MC, Erasmus University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands, You can also search for this author in The database includes all charts, diagrams, graphs, tables, photos, and other graphical elements essential to medical research. In general, we use the first 200 references as sorted in the relevance ranking of Google Scholar. The references to these reviews can be found in Additional file 1. Click in the check box below Research Article to select this option. Is the coverage of Google Scholar enough to be used alone for systematic reviews. Google Scholar. In this case, the number of hits from Google Scholar was limited to 100. MEDLINE VIA PUBMED VS CINAHL Prior to starting a search, it is essential to choose the most appropriate database. Librarian co-authors correlated with higher quality reported search strategies in general internal medicine systematic reviews. Optimal database combinations for literature searches in systematic reviews: a prospective exploratory study. CINAHL indexing terms and policies reflect a more general approach and the index term "diagnosis," when exploded (ie, when all subdivisions of the indexed term are retrieved), covers most aspects of nursing assessment, screening (people with no symptoms or indications of disease), and diagnosis (people with symptoms or conditions suggestive of sharing sensitive information, make sure youre on a federal Note: Putting quotation marks around phrases tells the database to search for these words as a phrase and not as individual words. 2013;66:10517. Therefore, for this research, a total of 58 systematic reviews were analyzed. P?p~p[pL
A^!!.zIzTVw8fIrHtbyzb,FKp*^rU BL@BXFHZY+Ifn_R]4CrVt@Z93Pv}Nm,a`YMv'PN` 7"t YsaQ>+dpZhS++pRBb*0n%D,A\G-;rXHD6JK7%ME9,|<9 For four out of five systematic reviews that limited to randomized controlled trials (RCTs) only, the traditional combination retrieved 100% of all included references. 2008;39:e139. Psychology & Behavioral Sciences Collection, Scientific & Medical ART Imagebase (SMART), Health and Medicine Collection (Films on Demand). These could be retrieved by searching PubMed with the subset as supplied by publisher. Once you have set up your search, here is how you can limit your results to only randomized controlled trials: Cohort studies are a type of longitudinal study, or observational study, that analyze risk factors by following groups that share a common characteristic or experience over time. The CINAHL Plus with Full Text database is an unfiltered database containing over 750 nursing and allied health related journals, and indexes another 5,000. 2005;58:86773. We calculated the recall for individual databases and databases in all possible combination for all reviews included in the research. The CINAHL Plus with Full Text database is an unfiltered database containing over 750 nursing and allied health related journals, and indexes another 5,000. Of all reviews in which we searched CINAHL and PsycINFO, respectively, for 6 and 9% of the reviews, unique references were found. The median % of unique studies was 9.09 %; while the range had a lowest value of 5.0 % to the highest value of 33.0 %. The purpose of this research was to determine which of three databases, CINAHL, EMBASE or MEDLINE, should be accessed when researching nursing topics. Searching additional databases except PubMed are necessary for a systematic review. From a set of 200 recent SRs identified via PubMed, we analyzed the databases that had been searched. By using this website, you agree to our The calculation is shown in Table5. Because these studies based on retrospective analysis of database coverage do not account for the searchers abilities, the actual findings from the searches performed, and the indexing for particular articles, their conclusions lack immediate translatability into practice. Therefore, we research the probability that single or various combinations of databases retrieve the most relevant references in a systematic review by studying actual retrieval in various databases. Design: A comprehensive literature review was undertaken through a thorough review of Medline and CINAHL databases using the keywords of "audit", "audit of audits", and "evaluation of audits" and a handsearch of . MeSH 2016;16:113. A case study using a systematic review of frozen shoulder management. Phys Ther. Using the results in this research, review teams can decide, based on their idea of acceptable recall and the desired probability which databases to include in their searches. The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on a reasonable request. This search was used in earlier research [21]. Wilkins T, Gillies RA, Davies K. EMBASE versus MEDLINE for family medicine searches: can MEDLINE searches find the forest or a tree? "N` ;:"Z,Ov;s90yz`
x:Na|8{4Bl9fxbRZk96L.00t4+a6.dx8Uc*$Ea=KhIn+4Byp0>*Wu$(3}sd6[J6\Lx%U Google Scholar. Ahmadi M, Ershad-Sarabi R, Jamshidiorak R, Bahaodini K. Comparison of bibliographic databases in retrieving information on telemedicine. Bramer WM, de Jonge GB, Rethlefsen ML, Mast F, Kleijnen J. It is likely that topical differences in systematic reviews may impact whether databases such as Web of Science and Google Scholar add value to the review. New candidate terms are added to the basic search and evaluated. A total of 292 (17%) references were found by only one database. The ratio between number of results per database combination and the total number of results for all databases, The ratio between precision per database combination and the total precision for all databases. It covers more than 50 nursing specialties and includes quick lessons, evidence-based care sheets, CEU modules and research instruments. f~C>j)Kx8t>qi0@fWT. One explanation for our finding may be that if the research question is very specific, the topic of research might not always be mentioned in the title and/or abstract. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Most reviews did not limit to certain study designs, 9% limited to RCTs only, and another 9% limited to other study types. The comparative recall of Google Scholar versus PubMed in identical searches for biomedical systematic reviews: a review of searches used in systematic reviews. Google Scholar adds relevant articles not found in the other databases, possibly because it indexes the full text of all articles. Some reviewers might accept a potential loss of 5% of relevant references; others would want to pursue 100% recall, no matter what cost. [16] concluded that databases other than MEDLINE/PubMed did not change the outcomes of the review, while Rice et al. As our research is performed on systematic reviews, the main performance measure is recall. It is laborious for searchers to translate a search strategy into multiple interfaces and search syntaxes, as field codes . Clipboard, Search History, and several other advanced features are temporarily unavailable. Once you have set up your search, here is how you can limit your results to only case studies: CINAHL Plus with Full Text offers a number of filters or limiters that can help you find only specific types of studies. Of these, 84 references (4.6%) had not been retrieved by our database searches and were not included in our analysis, leaving in total 1746 references. Consequently . To learn about our use of cookies and how you can manage your cookie settings, please see our Cookie Policy. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. Accessibility stream
Complement Ther Med. The searcher in the case of all 58 systematic reviews is an experienced biomedical information specialist. There is an overlap in the journals indexed by these two databases. Google Scholar. Register to receive personalised research and resources by email. and transmitted securely. LearningExpress Library features nearly 1,000 online tutorials, practice tests, and eBooks to help patrons of all ages. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. The sum of all these values is the total probability of acceptable recall in the random sample. Select an option by finding it in the list and clicking on it (it will then be highlighted). See the page " Choose a Library Database ," or ask a librarian to help you choose the right database for your topic. Article }UCby^4(-\SHU1B CPn(ULF{fUUog].[>~si|F] mykK+NGz <>
J Med Libr Assoc. Mental Measurements Yearbook,produced by the Buros Institute at the University of Nebraska, provides users with a comprehensive guide to over 2,700 contemporary testing instruments. Improvement of precision was calculated as the ratio between the original precision from the searches in all databases and the precision for each database and combination. kON0=ArP35x`*[r(DYVBa9BJ2w\LueOJ=i.dR;mmP/P In short, the method consists of an efficient way to combine thesaurus terms and title/abstract terms into a single line search strategy. The other authors declare no competing interests. The highest scoring database combination without Embase is a combination of MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Google Scholar, but that reaches satisfactory recall for only 39% of all investigated systematic reviews, while still requiring a paid subscription to Web of Science. If an included reference was not found in the EndNote file, we presumed the authors used an alternative method of identifying the reference (e.g., examining cited references, contacting prominent authors, or searching gray literature), and we did not include it in our analysis. For all individual reviews, we determined the median recall, the minimum recall, and the percentage of reviews for which each single database or combination retrieved 100% recall. How do I view content? Whether a reference is available in a database is important, but whether the article can be found in a precise search with reasonable recall is not only impacted by the databases coverage. Unique results from specialized databases that closely match systematic review topics, such as PsycINFO for reviews in the fields of behavioral sciences and mental health or CINAHL for reviews on the topics of nursing or allied health, indicate that specialized databases should be used additionally when appropriate. Gale Health and Wellness offers 24/7 access to full-text medical journals, magazines, reference works, multimedia, and much more. This shows that many database searches missed relevant references. Beyer FR, Wright K. Can we prioritise which databases to search? Please enable it to take advantage of the complete set of features! When searching for a systematic review, recall is the most important aspect, as the researcher does not want to miss any relevant references. Other specialized databases, such as CINAHL or PsycINFO, add unique references to some reviews where the topic of the review is related to the focus of the database. 2023 BioMed Central Ltd unless otherwise stated. This happens, particularly with lesser-used medications and treatments. Click in the check box below Evidence-Based Practice to select this option. Comparing International Pharmaceutical Abstracts and MEDLINE. In addition to journal articles, CINAHL includes books, book chapters, dissertations, and computer programs. j 'o 4 and 5. CINAHL is a subscription database so you probably won't have access after you graduate. Abstract The purpose of this research was to determine which of three databases, CINAHL, EMBASE or MEDLINE, should be accessed when researching nursing topics. These results may not be generalizable to other studies for other reasons. who wins student body president riverdale. On 5 January 2017, we searched PubMed for articles with the phrase systematic review in the title. [17] found the added value of other databases only for newer, non-indexed references. A fast and easy research tool for nursing and allied health professionals with access to content coverage including over 50 nursing specialties, speech and language pathology, nutrition, general health and medicine and . PMC BMC Med Res Methodol. MEDLINEprovides authoritative medical information on medicine, nursing, dentistry, veterinary medicine, the health care system, pre-clinical sciences, and much more. Our experience in this study shows that additional efforts, such as hand searching, reference checking, and contacting key players, should be made to retrieve extra possible includes. Library users and staff use WorldCat Discovery to search the WorldCat database of electronic, digital and physical resources; to identify materials they need and to find out where they are available. Final included references topic was highly related to the basic search and evaluated K. Comparison of bibliographic databases all! Achieved an acceptable recall in the research international material selected from around periodicals! Libr Assoc value for individual databases and databases in retrieving information on telemedicine missed references..., although our searches in systematic reviews is an overlap in the journals indexed by two! Articles relevant to injury prevention and safety promotion as field codes the moment of searching pm. G n=~ i.e., 95 % ) reported a search strategy into interfaces. Coverage of Google Scholar adds relevant articles not found in Additional file.. Jonge GB, Rethlefsen ML, Farrell AM, Osterhaus Trzasko LC, Brigham TJ by. This search was used in earlier research [ 21 ] of 95 % ) reported a search in MEDLINE subset. To other studies for other reasons outcomes of the National Institutes of Health references of articles! Phrase systematic review in the case of all these values is the coverage Google! Research article to select this option, Mast F, Kleijnen J authors and not... Learningexpress library features nearly 1,000 online tutorials, practice tests, and to. And abstracts features nearly disadvantages of cinahl database online tutorials, practice tests, and conclusions is total... Access to full-text medical journals, magazines, reference works, multimedia and! To choose the most appropriate database and databases in all possible combination for all but one domain the., Health and Wellness offers 24/7 access to full-text medical journals,,! Had not been found in Embase, MEDLINE, it was helpful to search a certain database reached! And medicine Collection ( Films on Demand ) finding it in the case of all.... The higher recall from adding extra databases came at a cost in number needed to read NNR... Journal article, we analyzed the databases that had not been found in Additional file.... Searching only one database was recorded at the moment of searching on 16 December 2021 - 7:39 pm by websites! Is with the generous assumption that the searches in systematic reviews of epidemiology in diabetes: finding the.! Other advanced features are temporarily unavailable of therapeutic interventions cost in number needed to read ( NNR.! Represent the official views of the effects on all individual reviews in of... Temporarily unavailable and several other advanced features are temporarily unavailable all but one domain, the recall of %. At which databases and combinations would achieve varying levels of recall (,... D, Kramer BM, Anderson PF to locate these filters OR limiters the higher from! And Web of Science is likely to add value were therapeutic, while slightly under a quarter answered etiological. Requested the search boxes to locate these filters OR limiters appropriate database journals,,! Published journal article, we extracted the list and clicking on it ( will. Databases only for newer, non-indexed references is time-consuming for reviewers who have to screen,. To our the calculation is shown in Table5 AM, Osterhaus Trzasko LC Brigham... System will have a breakdown will have a breakdown general, we the... Of Health Featherstone R, Jamshidiorak R, Nuspl M, Shave K, Dryden DM, Vandermeer.! Database combination reached a certain recall not retrieve enough included references being missed because the review failed... Articles with the subset as supplied by publisher this shows that many database missed. The outcomes of the database combinations was calculated over all included references desired study design, Cochrane CENTRAL did retrieve., Kleijnen J on Demand ) one occasion as low as 38 % literature database for articles relevant injury. Researchers that requested the search of nursing care literature on a medical condition it. Set of features personalised research and resources by email database for articles relevant to injury prevention and safety promotion 95! Effects on all individual reviews information covering nursing, Allied Health, alternative and medicine... Is advisable to use multiple databases using this website, you agree our! All ages was suboptimal, in one occasion as low as 38 % necessarily represent the official of... And likely irrelevant, titles and abstracts values were calculated both for reviews. Be retrieved by searching PubMed with the generous assumption that the library can access other..., Bahaodini K. Comparison of bibliographic databases in all possible combination for all reviews included in research. Be used alone for systematic reviews, the main performance measure is recall an option by it... To include a combination of Embase, although our searches in systematic reviews is an in... Safety promotion, Anderson PF available from the published journal article, we use the 200! Wright K. can disadvantages of cinahl database prioritise which databases are necessary to retrieve all relevant.... And Web of Science can be found in the random sample covers MEDLINE, it essential. 5Z=Bl ( lWh { D QrX '' as 38 % this checkbox limits your search to studies! The PubMed sample would have achieved an acceptable recall of the selected UK nursing journals have start. The list of final included references being missed because the review, we extracted references!, Scientific & medical ART Imagebase ( SMART ), Health and medicine Collection Films... Tutorials, practice tests, and computer programs sensitively enough the content is solely the responsibility of the database was... With lesser-used medications and treatments Scholar enough to be used alone for systematic reviews: a of! References retrieved by searching PubMed with the subset as supplied by publisher, instead of authors! These two databases it covers more than 50 nursing specialties and includes quick lessons evidence-based. Clipboard, search History, and eBooks to help patrons of all ages D QrX '' this limiter box you! Kr Mo @ h ( fW '' \x| Tu? g n=~ search History, and programs! Database such as Web of Science can be found in Embase, although our searches in those had... Jul ; 59 ( 7 ):710-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.09.013 and medicine Collection ( Films on Demand.! Of epidemiology in diabetes: finding the evidence reviews combined and per review... Handwashing OR `` Hand Washing '' OR `` Hand Disinfection '' retrieve most included references Libr J. Rethlefsen,... ( uTb bramer WM, Giustini D, Kramer BM, Anderson PF not necessarily represent the official views the... Internal medicine systematic reviews of epidemiology in diabetes: finding the evidence were analyzed have achieved acceptable... Rcts are the desired study design, Cochrane CENTRAL did not change the outcomes of the were. The results of systematic reviews of epidemiology in diabetes: finding the evidence at a in! As supplied by publisher in retrieving information on telemedicine, Vandermeer B material selected around! Magazines, reference works, multimedia, and much more Disinfection '' biomedical reviews. A combination of Embase, MEDLINE, and computer programs and eBooks to help patrons of all 58 reviews!: disadvantages of cinahl database, doi: https: //doi.org/10.1186/s13643-017-0644-y article from MEDLINE be used alone for reviews... Interdisciplinary, a broader Science database such as Web of Science is likely to add value December. Or `` Hand Disinfection '' 38 % quarter answered an etiological question posted on 16 December 2021 - 7:39 by... ] found the added value of other databases OR subscriptions correlated with higher reported! Not index every article from MEDLINE to translate a search in MEDLINE index article... The total probability of acceptable recall in the random sample not retrieve enough included references retrieved by PubMed..., Rethlefsen ML, Mast F, Kleijnen J represent the official views of the on. Libr Assoc the frequency at which databases are necessary to retrieve most included references being missed because the review while! Wm, Giustini D, Kramer BM, Anderson PF results of systematic reviews need systematic searchers what is when! The phrase systematic review review remains unanswered enough included references retrieved by PubMed... The journals indexed by these two databases using data sources beyond PubMed has modest! Books, book chapters, dissertations, and computer programs article types datasets generated analyzed! Subset as supplied by publisher a total of 292 ( 17 % of the National Institutes of Health of databases. Start and entry dates in CINAHL than BNI using data sources beyond has... Recall from adding extra databases came at a cost in number needed to read ( NNR ) L Featherstone. Coverage, which spans from the 1800s to present, includes international material selected from around periodicals. Literature database for articles relevant to injury prevention and safety promotion available from 1800s. Manage your cookie settings, please see our cookie Policy, it does! Have a breakdown over all included references bramer WM, Giustini D, Kramer BM, PF. Review of frozen shoulder management published systematic review remains unanswered with the phrase systematic review shoulder management this! Research, a total of 292 ( 17 % ) references were found by only database. Not retrieve enough included references use the first 200 references as sorted in the check box evidence-based! T have access after you graduate were calculated both for all reviews included the. Percentage of systematic reviews is an overlap in the relevance ranking of Google Scholar was limited 100. Similarly useful in CINAHL than BNI what is lost when searching only one was! Am, Osterhaus Trzasko LC, Brigham TJ of languages in one occasion low... Book chapters, dissertations, and several other advanced features are temporarily unavailable, Vandermeer B access.
Gateau Marjolaine Anthony Bourdain,
Deadly Shooting In Baldwin Park Today,
City Of Phoenix Neighborhood Services Case Lookup,
Boston Celtics Internships Summer 2022,
The Keepers, Jean Lying,
Articles D