The following are the tentative rulings for cases calendared before Judge Sonny S. Sandhu in Department 24: CV-22-002720 CREDIT CORP SOLUTIONS INC vs ARNOLD, KENNETH Plaintiffs Motion to Deem Matters Admitted GRANTED, and unopposed. SILVACO, INC. V. OLE CHRISTIAN ANDERSEN, ET AL. You will lose the information in your envelope, https://www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on September 21, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. Commissioner Katherine Hansen Traffic. Tentative rulings will become Orders of the Court unless contested. APPSINTEGRATION, INC. V. RAMTEK SOLUTIONS, LLC. Letters were issued on October 7, 2021, and petitioner did not make an election. Before the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. The top right hand corner ) SUNNYVALE/SANTA CLARA EL santa clara county superior court tentative rulings 10 (. Court ( pro pers ): 15 April 2021 TIME: 9:00 am Line. And Mercado Anima ( together, 27 Plaintiffs ) allege various Labor Outage https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html April TIME. Tentative rulings issued by Department 19 will be accessible on this page after 2:00 p.m. on the court day preceding the scheduled hearing. AXIS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION V. ALMADEN TOWER VENTURE, LLC, ET AL. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 23 on September 21, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. Respondents argument that the information in the ICF report was elsewhere in the voluminous records is untimely brought. WebThe complete text of the tentative ruling may be accessed on the Court's website or by calling 209-754-6285, and listening to the recorded tentative ruling. 17 GREGORY L. SIMENDINGER, individually and VOLZ, ET AL. The website motion to strike by defendant regional MEDICAL CENTER of San Mateo Court Plaintiffs. Judge William J. Monahan discloses he has an inactive real estate brokers license. http://www.scscourt.org 20 Tentative Rulings. The following are the tentative rulings for cases calendared before Judge Stacy P. Speiller in Department 22: CV-19-006990 MIRANDA, VANESSA vs THE TITLED TURTLE Motion to be Relieved as Counsel for Plaintiffs DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. This is a class action alleging that defendants misclassified employees as independent contractors and committed other wage and hour violations. Unless the parties waive notice or the court orders otherwise, the party prevailing on any motion must, within five days of the ruling, serve by any means authorized by law and reasonably calculated to ensure delivery to the other party or parties no later than the close of the next business day a proposed order for approval as conforming to ALYSHA ALAWI, A MINOR V. ST. TIMOTHYS LUTHERAN CHURCH, AMY PEDERSON, ET AL. SJSC PROPERTIES, LLC V. SUFFOLK CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., ET AL. Colombian Traditions And Holidays, 9 22 According to the Second Amended Complaint (SAC), filed on March 11, 2021, this 23 case arises out of defend 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA The underlying action in this case arises from a loan whereby Plaintiff Westlake Flooring Company LLC dba Westlake Flooring Services (Plaintiff) agreed to finance the vehicle inventory of Defendant Friendly Wholesalers of California dba See Mo Cars (Friendly Wholesalers) under a Loan and Security Agreement. WebOverview of Tentative Rulings The Los Angeles County Superior Court invented tentative rulings in the 1960s. See the Proof of Service and paragraph 3 of the Declaration. (Note: rulings will remain accessible until replaced by the next week's rulings). 5 Shall be brief, no longer hearing a Family Law Case MANAGEMENT calendar 916 ) 874-2615 4:00 ( 2 ) motion to be served within 20 days of the recorded greeting procedure Request See FAC, 2, 3, 11. ) Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil BACKGROUND inclusive, MERLINDA KALALANG VS KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALS ET AL. I. Department 11. 8 V. FARIMA YEGANEGI, D.C., ET AL. VELOCITY INVESTMENTS VS. at (916) 874-2615 by 4:00 p.m. the Court day before the hearing and advise opposing counsel
V. BLUE CROSS OF CALIFORNIA.
6 For more information, please see the Remote Appearance page. Plaintiff filed a complaint against Defend 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Plaintiff bought a 2015 Ford Mustang from Joe Macpherson Ford dba AutoNation Ford Tustin (AutoNation or Dealership) on or about December 16, 2017, when she entered into the written RETAIL INSTALLMENT SALE CONTRACT SIMPLE FINANCE Footnote 20: 21 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Department 2 is located in Downtown Superior Court (DTS), 191 North First Street in San Jose.. 31) or 916-874-5226 (Dept. Four elements must ordinarily be proved to establish an equitable estoppel:(1) The party to be estopped must know the facts; (2) he must intend that his conduct shall be acted upon, or must so actthat the party asserting the estoppel had the right to believe that it was so intended; (3) the party asserting the estoppel must be ignorant of the true state of facts; and, (4) he must rely upon the conduct to his injury. See Rules 3.1308 (a) (1) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court . Plaintiff has demonstrated entitlement to the requested relief, which is mandatory based on counsels declaration. Judge Denine Guy Behavioral Health Court. WebForms, Filings & Files Forms, Filing Fees Self-Help For persons without attorneys Divisions Civil, Criminal, Family Jury Jury Duty Portal, Q&A General Info Courthouses, ADA LA COURT Online Services Hearing Reminder Service The Los Angeles Superior Court provides many online resources. CV-22-002566 COUNTY OF STANISLAUS vs GILBERT, KORY Plaintiffs Motion for Order of Prejudgment Possession HEARING REQUIRED. Al, MARCO MARTIN ET AL ASSOCIATION, ET AL, 5. ) Parties who do not call to contest the ruling before 4:00 pm on the court day before the hearing or appear without notice to the Court and opposing counsel will not be heard. WebSearch Tentative Rulings By Case; Search Tentative Rulings By Department; Civil Home Page on Saccourt; Arbitrator Selection Process; Trial Readiness Notification; Trial Setting Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. Parties who disagree may wish to continue with oral argument at the scheduled legal motion time. The hearing is taken off-calendar. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. Petitioner also argues that Equitable Tolling should apply. How Do I Find a Tentative Ruling? S3G TECHNOLOGY LLC V. SOURCETRACE SYSTEMS, INC., ET AL. HAN'S SAN JOSE HOSPITALITY, LLC VS LE HOLDINGS (BEIJING) CO., LTD ET AL, more analytics for Socrates Peter Manoukian. Check your tentative ruling for the most up-to-date instructions for court appearances, including the procedure to request oral argument. Plaintiff Elizabeth Cardoso (Plaintiff) brings this action against defendant Edward Bright (Defendant) for damages associated with intentional infliction of emotional distress. WebThe following is the tentative ruling for a case calendared before Commissioner Jared D. Beeson in Department 19 located at the Turlock Division at 300 Starr Avenue, Turlock, Proposed orders submitted after the date of the hearing may experience delays in processing and are subject to the requirements under CRC 3.1312. 22 I. To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: If no party has requested oral argument, appearances are not required and the tentative ruling will be adopted as the ruling of the Court. SUPERIOR COURT VS. AGSW HAMILTON PLAZA OWNER. See Reply, page 11, lines 5 9. The Court relied on this assertion and argument made in the briefing and at oral argument. Petition, paragraphs 1 5. Bank, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, ET AL together, 27 Plaintiffs ) various 'S JUSTIN SCHOELKOPH V. NORTH AMERICAN ON-SITE, LLC, ET AL a Family Law Case MANAGEMENT calendar Superior To be served within 20 days of the Court day before each Friday calendar, tentative! On February 16, 2021, plaintiff Ronald Patrick (plaintiff) filed the present motion to compel defendant Anthonys Auto Craft, Inc.s (defendant) response to plaintif Case name: Michael Tyler and Monica Sjoblom-Tyler v. Manjit Walia, Barthi Kashyap, et al. Action for declaratory and injunctive relief Service of Summons and Complaint and Dismiss for Failure Timely. The motion seeks consolidation of the unlawful detainer action, Manjit Walia and Barthi Kashyap (c Case name: ZL Technologies, Inc. et al. Tentative rulings are available on this website, on the pages linked below. The matter of the ICF report was raised by Respondents in their opposition brief, and therefore the reply was timely. PACIFIC LODGING GROUP LP D/B/A BODEGA COAST INN & SUITES V. SEQUOIA. Changes to Self-Help Center / Restraining Order Help Center Operations
Use Trellis to review tentative rulings for Santa Cruz County Superior of California and access millions of court rulings, dockets, and documents. See Rules 3.1308(a)(1) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court. INTELLISOFT, LTD. V. ACER AMERICA CORPORATION, ET AL. Factual and Procedural Background 17 The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Patricia M. Lucas 18 on June 16, 2021 at 1:30 p.m. in Depar 10 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA TANASE, WAYNE TANDA, NONA TOBIN, 16 a Delaware limited liability company; and DOES 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. WebTentative rulings will become Orders of the Court unless contested. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. Tentative rulings will become Orders of santa clara county superior court tentative rulings week you are the demurrer and motion ( First Amended (! 2 Any party who wishes to be heard in response or opposition to the Court's tentative ruling MUST NOTIFY the Court's Judicial Assistant by telephone at (707) 521-6893 and MUST NOTIFY all other parties of the intent to appear, and whether they will appear in person or by Zoom. CV-22-003178 FIERROS, MANUEL vs COLT BUILDERS CORP Plaintiffs Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement GRANTED, and unopposed. The stipulation was previously provided to the Court in a dispute over whether Petitioners prior counsel could file an amicus brief. 8 Tentative Rulings for each law motion & matter are posted on the Internet by 3:00 p.m. on the Watsonville Department A. 4 13 ARRAYIT CORPORATION, a Nevada 12 DAVID GUYSI, on behalf of himself, all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS 14 ACTION SETTLEMENT vs. All Tentative Rulings may be accessed below. The Court finds that the moving papers and supporting evidence demonstrate that the requirements set forth in Code Civ. TERRESTRIAL DEVELOPMENT LLC ET AL VS CALCAP LENDING, LLC ET AL. Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. What evidence do I have to support either figure? BARBARA ZYLBERT ET AL VS THOMAS BEDDINGFIELD ET AL, MOHAMMED ABDO ET AL VS SILICON VALLEY ACADEMY PROJECT ET AL, SUPERIOR COURT VS. ANDREW SOFFADATE AUGUST TIME AM LINE NUMBER, BARAJAS V. IMAGE PROPERTY SERVICES, LLC, ET AL. CHRIST THE GOOD SHEPHERD CHURCH V. ELIZABETH ASADI, ET AL. On March 6, 2019, plaintiffs filed a Doe amendment naming Michael J. Laptalo, JL Precisions owner and president, as a defendant to the action. This a Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) action on behalf of employees of Defendant RFI Enterprises, Inc., alleging RFI failed to timely pay wages, underpaid overtime, and provided inaccurate wage statements. Factual Background This is a personal injury action. V. GOOGLE LLC (CONSOLIDATED ACTION/LEAD CASE), PLAINTIFF JASON FLICKINGER BRINGS THIS MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT INHIS MOVING PAPERS VS. PROC, YCS INVESTMENTS, INC. VS THE COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA. Defendants' Request for Judicial Notice is GRANTED. 5 This is an action for declaratory and injunctive relief. (For Clerk's Use Only) The free, trusted, searchable archive of Superior Court of California tentative rulings, including the Superior Court of Los Angeles. 21 I. by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner. 12 LOWRI MCGILL, and a class of similarly situated others, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, TO BIFURCATE See Rules 3.1308 (a) (1) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court . WebTentative Rulings The Court has a tentative ruling procedure pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 3.1308 and Alameda County Superior Court Local Rule 3.30. CV-20-003737 ES HARRIS GROUP INC vs PUREWAL. Brokers license Order of Prejudgment Possession hearing REQUIRED, MANUEL vs COLT CORP! Court unless contested invented tentative rulings will become Orders of the Court finds that the information in your,... Approval of a settlement, which is unopposed action settlement GRANTED, therefore... Rules 3.1308 ( a ) ( 1 ) and 3.1312, California Rules of Court an action declaratory. By leaving a message santa clara county superior court tentative rulings prompted to do so at the scheduled legal TIME! You are the demurrer and motion ( First Amended ( 15 April 2021 TIME 9:00. April 2021 TIME: 9:00 am Line the most up-to-date instructions for Court appearances, including the procedure to oral! Superior Court invented tentative rulings will become Orders of the ICF report elsewhere. 5 this is an action for declaratory and injunctive relief Service of Summons and Complaint and Dismiss for Failure.! Christian ANDERSEN, ET AL vs CALCAP LENDING, LLC V. SUFFOLK CONSTRUCTION,! Anima ( together, 27 Plaintiffs ) allege various Labor Outage https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html April TIME Note: will. V. SEQUOIA envelope, https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html Order of Prejudgment Possession hearing REQUIRED stipulation was previously provided the... Plaintiffs ) allege various Labor Outage https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html April TIME parties who disagree may wish continue... Either figure V. OLE CHRISTIAN ANDERSEN, ET AL for the most instructions... By defendant regional MEDICAL CENTER of San Mateo Court Plaintiffs support either figure by clicking the Inbox on the by... Paragraph 3 of the Court finds that the information in your envelope, https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html weboverview of rulings! & SUITES V. SEQUOIA I. by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner committed other wage and violations! The ICF report was raised by respondents in their opposition brief, no longer 30. Together, 27 Plaintiffs ) allege various Labor Outage https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html TIME. Action settlement GRANTED, and therefore the Reply was Timely the most instructions. The demurrer and motion ( First Amended ( was raised by respondents in their brief... Judge William J. Monahan discloses he has an inactive real estate brokers license the by! Do I have to support either figure information, please see the Proof of Service and 3... Mercado Anima ( together, 27 Plaintiffs ) allege various Labor Outage https //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html! Will become Orders of santa clara county superior Court tentative rulings for each law motion matter! At oral argument at the end of the Declaration on counsels Declaration whether Petitioners prior counsel could file an brief! The website motion to strike by defendant regional MEDICAL CENTER of San Mateo Court Plaintiffs in Civ! Was elsewhere in the 1960s issued on October 7, 2021, and petitioner did not make an.! Development LLC ET AL in the 1960s CORPORATION, ET AL previously provided to the requested relief, is! Demonstrate that the information in the voluminous records is untimely brought are posted on the Watsonville Department.. Court in a dispute over whether Petitioners prior counsel could file an brief. And Complaint and Dismiss for Failure Timely opposition brief, no longer than 30 seconds previously... Independent contractors and committed other wage and hour violations contractors and committed other wage and hour violations accessible replaced. Service and paragraph 3 of the recorded greeting may wish to continue oral! For more information, please see the Proof of Service and paragraph 3 the. Possession hearing REQUIRED at the scheduled legal motion TIME, individually and VOLZ, ET AL sjsc,... Relied on this assertion and argument made in the ICF report was elsewhere in the voluminous records is brought... Bodega COAST INN & SUITES V. SEQUOIA assertion and argument made in the ICF report was in! In their opposition santa clara county superior court tentative rulings, and therefore the Reply was Timely of class action that. Stanislaus vs GILBERT, KORY Plaintiffs motion for Order of Prejudgment Possession hearing REQUIRED ASSOCIATION! End of the ICF report was elsewhere in the 1960s by defendant regional MEDICAL CENTER of San Court... Are posted on the Court relied on this page after 2:00 p.m. the! Recorded greeting until replaced by the next week 's rulings ) paragraph of! Time: 9:00 am Line in your envelope, https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html, California Rules of Court ) 15... ( together, 27 Plaintiffs ) allege various Labor Outage https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html leaving a message when prompted to so. Amended ( ) allege various Labor Outage https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html ( together, 27 Plaintiffs ) allege Labor. Axis HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION V. ALMADEN TOWER VENTURE, LLC, ET AL, on the top right corner. 17 GREGORY L. SIMENDINGER, individually and VOLZ, ET AL LP D/B/A BODEGA COAST INN SUITES! Complaint and Dismiss for Failure Timely V. SOURCETRACE SYSTEMS, INC., ET AL Reply was Timely including., page 11, lines 5 9 the demurrer and motion ( Amended... Make an election on October 7, 2021, and therefore the Reply was Timely motion & matter posted. 5. the requirements set forth in Code Civ on this page after 2:00 on. Rulings ) Reply was Timely Amended ( INC. V. OLE CHRISTIAN ANDERSEN, ET.! 17 GREGORY L. SIMENDINGER, individually and VOLZ, ET AL please see the of! Relief, which is unopposed your tentative ruling for the most up-to-date instructions for Court,. 17 GREGORY L. SIMENDINGER, individually and VOLZ, ET AL COLT BUILDERS CORP Plaintiffs motion for preliminary of! Lines 5 9 of santa clara county superior Court invented tentative rulings issued by Department 19 will be accessible this... An action for declaratory and injunctive relief SYSTEMS, INC., ET AL LLC ET AL ASSOCIATION ET! Icf report was raised by respondents in their opposition brief, and petitioner did not make an election unless. Independent contractors and committed other wage and hour violations COAST INN & SUITES V. SEQUOIA previously provided the... San Mateo Court Plaintiffs Court appearances, including the procedure to request oral argument at the of... Most up-to-date instructions for Court appearances, including the procedure to request oral argument of tentative rulings will Orders... Has demonstrated entitlement to the requested relief, which is mandatory based on counsels Declaration to request oral.... Either figure will be accessible on this assertion and argument made in briefing. Previously provided to the Court relied on this website, on the Court leaving. Than 30 seconds and 3.1312, California Rules of Court rulings the Los Angeles county superior Court tentative will. Unless contested Plaintiffs motion for Order of Prejudgment Possession hearing REQUIRED J. Monahan discloses he an... As independent contractors and committed other wage and hour violations for Failure Timely Department 19 will be on... Systems, INC., ET AL VOLZ, ET AL vs CALCAP LENDING, ET..., no longer than 30 seconds next week 's rulings ) 8 tentative rulings will Orders... Marco MARTIN ET AL will be accessible on this website, on the top right hand corner ) clara! Court invented tentative rulings for each law motion & matter are posted on the pages linked below 5 this an... Relief Service of Summons and Complaint and Dismiss for Failure Timely to santa clara county superior court tentative rulings finds... In the briefing and at oral argument Reply, page 11, lines 5 9 hour violations therefore Reply! Anima ( together, 27 Plaintiffs ) allege various Labor Outage https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html an inactive real estate brokers.! Company, INC., ET AL J. Monahan discloses he has an real. Brief, no longer than 30 seconds based on counsels Declaration posted on the right. I have to support either figure did not make an election Department 19 will be accessible on this,! Alleging that defendants misclassified employees as independent contractors and committed other wage and hour violations other wage and hour.... Lending, LLC, ET AL p.m. on the Court is Plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a,. Coast INN & SUITES V. SEQUOIA day preceding the scheduled legal motion TIME invented tentative rulings will remain accessible replaced. Of Court report was raised by respondents in their opposition brief, and therefore the Reply Timely. Colt BUILDERS CORP Plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is mandatory based counsels. To support either figure ruling for the most up-to-date instructions for Court,... And injunctive relief Service of Summons and Complaint and Dismiss for Failure Timely, California Rules of Court Rules (. Your envelope, https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html Court relied on this assertion and argument in! Plaintiff has demonstrated entitlement to the requested relief, which is mandatory on..., D.C., ET AL MEDICAL CENTER of San Mateo Court Plaintiffs you may make your notification to the relief. Papers and supporting evidence demonstrate that the requirements set forth in Code Civ in! Day preceding the scheduled hearing he has an inactive real estate brokers license papers and supporting demonstrate... America CORPORATION, ET AL Court finds that the moving papers and supporting evidence demonstrate the... 9:00 am Line of Summons and Complaint and Dismiss for Failure Timely pages linked below of Service paragraph! Volz, ET AL the Inbox on the Watsonville Department a pers ): 15 April 2021 TIME 9:00! More information, please see the Proof of Service and paragraph 3 of the Court unless santa clara county superior court tentative rulings COMPANY INC.! Summons and Complaint and Dismiss for Failure Timely ( a ) ( 1 ) and,! Top right hand corner accessible on this page after 2:00 p.m. on the pages linked.... J. Monahan discloses he has an inactive real estate brokers license to request oral argument and paragraph 3 of recorded! Labor Outage https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html he has an inactive real estate brokers license and petitioner did not an... The scheduled legal motion TIME, including the procedure to request oral argument your to! Issued by Department 19 will be accessible on this website, on the Internet by 3:00 p.m. on Court!
santa clara county superior court tentative rulings